trek_web_1.jpg
quick_lane_6.8_web.jpg
longworth_web_v2.jpg
aan_logo_color2.jpg
Home / Articles / General / Flicks /  Pride and Glory a tired bad-cop movie
. . . . . .
Wednesday, October 29,2008

Pride and Glory a tired bad-cop movie

By Glen Baity
art974

 

At this point in my movie-going life, I can think of a long list of things I’d rather watch than a group of hardened big-city cops waxing poetic about loyalty.


So Pride and Glory, to put it kindly, might not have been the film for me. A chatty, overlong slog, its many characters are preoccupied with where a police officer’s true allegiance should reside, and they talk about it. And talk about it. Then shout about it. Then talk about it some more. A few shots are fired, some punches thrown, but mostly it’s talking.

The film follows a family of cops: patriarch Frances Tierney Sr. (Jon Voight); his sons, commanding officer Frances Jr. (Noah Emmerich) and detective Ray (Edward Norton); and son-in-law Jimmy (Colin Farrell), a patrolman. Pride and Glory opens with a bang, as Jimmy, Ray and Frances are called to the scene of a bloodbath that has claimed the lives of four of Frances Jr.’s men. The city and the department are in an uproar, and Ray signs up for the special investigative unit assigned to the case. But he gets more than he bargained for when he finds out that the trail leads right back to the boys in blue, in particular to Frances Jr. and Jimmy, who are tied up to varying degrees in a cops-for-hire scheme.

It seems local gangsters are renting badges to use as muscle, and the deal is spinning out of control. It gets a bit more complicated, and the jargon-heavy script makes it all a bit hard to follow, but those are the particulars.

This set-up leads to plenty of second- and third-act rumination on what Ray should do with the knowledge of his brothers’ misdeeds. With Internal Affairs creeping in the shadows, should he do right by the city he serves? Or should his familial bonds restrain him? Is blood really thicker than water? You’ve probably seen this good-copbad-cop routine before, and there’s nothing about Pride and Glory to recommend it above other tarnished badge yarns. One of the more amazing things about this story is that it actually took four guys to come up with it, and one of them Joe Carnahan. He wrote 2002’s Narc, an excellent, bare-knuckle genre piece that stayed one step ahead of the viewer, and was highlighted by one the best performances of Ray Liotta’s career.

Carnahan’s latest is nothing like that taut bruiser. Pride and Glory needed about two fewer writers and a more strict editor to trim 30 or 40 unnecessary minutes off the final product. The film spends a lot of time navel-gazing, and director Gavin O’Conner doesn’t have the sense to reign in his cast’s melodramatic tendencies. There’s a lot of blatant overacting here — Emmerich is probably the worst offender, but he’s by no means the only guilty party — and it gives the film an artificial weight. This problem is exacerbated by a few plot points — Ray’s estranged wife, Frances Jr.’s wife with cancer, Frances Sr.’s pretty-obvious alcoholism — that ultimately add nothing to the film but phony gravitas.

In the end, Ray is the classic honest cop stuck in a no-win situation by a few loser colleagues who happen to be his flesh and blood. There are a lot of feverish lectures about loyalty and honor, a lot of envelopes stuffed full of dirty money, a lot of righteous “you broke my heart!” speeches from one brother to the next. It’s been done a million times, and while Pride and Glory is mainly mediocre, its crowded plot and overwrought acting drag it under.

To comment on this article, send your e-mail to glen.baity@gmail.com.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
POST A COMMENT
 
Close
Close
Close