I am now writing my column for YES! Weekly live on Twitter.
I
apologize in advance to my “followers” for the dozen “tweets” it’ll
take.For those reading this on my Twitter feed Monday morning; this
will be reprinted verbatim in the Wednesday edition of the paper I work
for.Neat gimmick, eh?For those reading this Wednesday in print, who
don’t know what Twitter is... well, I’m about to spent an entire column
trying to explain. Essentially, Twitter is a social networking site,
although it has more in common with a blog. Except you can’t really
comment except with your own Twitter feed. And you can direct “tweets”
(new posts) at specific other Twitterers.
So it’s kind of
like instant messaging, or texting (you can set it up to post from your
phone), or a chat room. Ah, hell... see what I mean? Twitter is
perhaps the fastest growing and most inexplicable result of the wave of
blogging and networking sites to date. In fact, I and many others
rejected in at first. Who wants one more website to check every day,
one more think that asks you to update it?And there’s this character
limit — the backbone of the thing. 140 tops. There’s even a little
counter that ticks off letters as you
type, unSee? I went over. Who came up with this, Hemingway? By the
way, I made damn sure to spell check Hemingway. This won’t be edited
for print.My editor and I decided that was part of the point. You
can’t edit Twitter posts (although you can delete them) (a fact I’m
sure many a hung-over Twitterer thanks god for. Can you imagine how
much trouble you could get in with an IM everyone can see?) So what
wore me down? How was I convinced to join the ranks of my fellow OCD
attention-mongers? Besides the fact I AM one? The tons of interesting
things I’ve seen done with the format. For instance, the interesting
and often hilarious feed of @warrenellis.
(by adding the “at”
symbol to Warren’s user name, I made it a link on my feed. Mine is @
chrislowrance.) Warren Ellis is a superb comics and novel writer, and
also has an overdeveloped sense of the comically depraved. His posts
on seasoning his steak with the tears of the cow it was carved from are
top notch.#Besides following the tweets of favorite authors, musicians
and other celebs, Twitter opens up a whole realm of experimentation.
Dylan Meconis, a cartoonist in Portland, Oregon,
recently began @ damejetsam. Basically, it’s an improvisational short
story. On her blog, Meconis said that Twitter’s restriction on editing
made the format appealing.
An excellent poet and prose writer
already, the confined medium suits her, and the story has a wonderful
lyrical quality. Back in the world of journalism, Twitter has quickly
been adopted as a practical tool.# As Mallary Jean Tenore wrote for the
Poynter Institute last year, despite an early backlash many major
newspapers have Twitter feeds. Among them: @nytimes, @cnn, and
@oregonian. The publications post breaking news with links to the full
story. Here in Greensboro, our only daily paper’s online reporter
tweets @ JohnNewsom.
Newsom’s feed scored a point back in
May, when a massive storm did heavy damage in the eastern part of the
city at the absolute worst time.# Early, early morning. So early it was
late for the morning edition. But Newsom was able to tweet the whole
thing as the facts came in.# I’m not sure if that’s better than a blog
with an RSS feed. Maybe it isn’t. But something about the immediacy of
the form attracts people.# And as journalists, we’ve got to go where
the readers are.


















