quick_lane_6.8_web.jpg
aan_logo_color2.jpg
Home / Articles / General / Staff column /  The problems with athletes as role models
. . . . . .
Wednesday, February 27,2013

The problems with athletes as role models

By YES! Staff
By Alex Ashe

In 1993, Nike released a nowiconic advertisement which featured then-pro basketball player Charles Barkley declaring, “I am not a role model.” The ad is so relevant today that its tagline could probably replace the increasingly ambiguous “Just Do It” as Nike’s slogan.

Nike cut ties with cyclist Lance Armstrong immediately after it became clear that he was using performance enhancing drugs during the prime of his career. It proved to be a smart move, as his lying, wrongful-defamation suits and attempted justification of the doping have overshadowed his cheating. Along with his titles, sponsorships and dignity, Armstrong lost the support of millions of Americans, many of whom were wearing his Livestrong bracelets just a few months ago.

One of the most inspirational stories of 2012, sprinter Oscar Pistorius made history by becoming the first double-amputee to compete in the Olympics last August. Just six months later, he has been charged with the murder of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. The investigation is ongoing as Pistorius awaits his trial but nonetheless, a very dark cloud surrounds the inspirational “blade runner.” Nike certainly regrets marketing Pistorius as “the bullet in the chamber,” recently pulling the ads and suspending its contract with the sprinter.

Tiger Woods’ fall from grace is a frontrunner for the biggest sports story of the young millennium. The revelations of the golfer’s many extramarital affairs turned his world upside down in an instant. By destroying his family life, Woods immediately went from the being one of the most marketable athletes of all-time to a pariah. The most shocking part about the scandal was that, apart from the occasional angry club slam, Woods had cultivated an immaculate reputation since his breakthrough in the ’90s. He was responsible for popularizing golf for both the African-American community and an entire generation of young people worldwide. Woods has been a mere mortal on the golf course since the scandal, with the legend of his descent growing with every major that he fails to win.

The list of accomplished athletes with tarnished pasts can go on and on, from Super Bowl champion Ray Lewis to home-run king Barry Bonds to 2012 Heisman Trophy winner Johnny Manziel.

It’s perfectly fine to look up to star athletes for their performances on the field, but we need to readjust our expectations of how athletes should act once the final whistle is blown.

By casting pro athletes as role models, we are setting ourselves up for disappointment, as there seems to be an increasing trend of inspirational sports stories being revealed as too good to be true.

Ever since the emergence of decade-long contracts and lucrative endorsement deals (worth amounts many people can’t even comprehend), pro athletes have never been less relatable to the average citizen.

Many athletes have gotten to where they are with little to no emphasis on academics. Many MLB and NBA players have forgone higher education. With the NBA now requiring players to spend a minimum of one year in college, academics are just a front for some players. During the recent Duke-UNC showdown, commentator Dick Vitale described the rule as “a mockery of the academic system.”

By living lives rooted in both privilege and stress, it’s difficult for professional athletes to maintain squeaky-clean images. With the non-stop media coverage, it’s even harder for them to get away with their mistakes.

Who, then, should kids view as role models?

It’s extremely ironic that so many sports stars turn out to be false idols when perhaps the most genuine and charitable athlete comes from a business often dismissed as “fake.”

Pro wrestling is practically a soap opera starring live-action superheroes and super-villains. Characters, storylines and matches are presented with great amounts of silliness, melodrama and hyperbole. In rare instances, however, pro wrestling writers incorporate bits of truth and reality into the product, as is the case with the WWE’s John Cena, who by all accounts, is a superhero outside of the ring.

The Make-A-Wish Foundation’s alltime leader in wishes granted, Cena has granted more than 300 wishes, and hopes to eventually make it to 1,000. As the foundation’s most requested wishgranter, Cena has been placed in the role model position for numerous American children. What’s refreshing is that he’s actually suited for the responsibility of being a positive influence.

In an industry infamous for steroids, steel-chair shots and stunts gone awry, Cena is a beacon of positivity. A champion of “hustle, loyalty and respect,” he’s served as the face of WWE during its transformation into family-friendly entertainment. Since his 2002 debut, Cena has never played the role of the antagonist, meaning that he is often written to overcome adversity, corruption and unlawfulness, all to show that good things happen to good people.

It’s for these exact reasons that Cena draws ire from the more seasoned wrestling fans, but instead of a squeaky-clean role model, they tend to look for an heir apparent to edgy characters like Stone Cold Steve Austin or the Rock. But then again, there’s a reason why we don’t rely on bloodthirsty wrestling fans to determine our role models.

If kids are going to have role models in sports settings, they should be their coaches or someone close who can directly teach them the difference between right and wrong.

Perhaps Sir Charles said it best back in 1993.

“Parents should be role models.”

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
This is perhaps the very worst column I've ever read. I know this is a free paper and not The New Yorker or anything close to a reputable new source, but for crying out loud this reads like something written by a 9th grader who rushed through his argumentative writing assignment so he could play more Modern Warfare 3 on X-Box before momma made him go to bed.Your first point about Lance Armstrong comes across as rephrasing something you heard on CNN that was said by people who are completly ignorant of cycling. Let me ask this question: If Lance Armstrong won seven Tour De France's in a row, and it had been proven that nearly everyone else in the field he was competing against was doping, how probable is it that he wasn't doping? He would have out-performed hundreds of other cycleists who were on drugs while he was clean, a feat which to any thinking person is impossible. What you say? He lied? Everyone lies when it suits them kiddo. The only people who idolized Lance Armstrong were fools. The fact that he 'cheated', which is debatable at best since his entire sport did the same thing, doesn't take away from the fact that his organization raised hundreds of trillions of dollars for cancer research. I'd say he did a good thing. Sure he 'cheated' but the result of that cheating was an incredibile amount of money raised to fight cancer and a exponential growth in peoples awareness of cancer prevention and early detection methods. I'd say Lance would be a good role model based on what he did for his fellow man. Forget about the practically meaningless sport of bike racing. The man has done more for cancer research and fundraising than any other human over the last decade.You mention the amputee runner who aledgedly killed his girl. Was his overcoming of a disability to do something nearly impossible worth idolizing? Not to me, he was more of a freak show. He too was probably on PED's. I don't think the youth of America said: "I want to be like the Lt. Dan Sprinter when I grow up, I'm going to lay on the train tracks til my legs get cut off so I can be in the Olympics too!!!" No one ever thought of this guy as a role model. He was even criticized for having an ADVANTAGE since his feet didn't get tired, he didn't get blisters, etc.Tiger Woods. Ah yes the golfer who brought the sport to the public's attention like no one in the modern era. He was such a good golfer that he had multi-trillion dollar endorsement deals and was given an image created by soulless marketing agents who were using him to sell everything from clothing to poorly made domestic sedans for retired people. Tiger was heavily criticized for his poor sportsmanship and lack of effort in engaging the press. Then it came out he liked sex. Oh my! Not another immeasurably wealthy male who was raised to believe he was above the law who has had sex with more women than one in his life! Michael Jordan did the same thing. Is his competitive desire to be the best he could be less impressive because he was banging other women on the side? Do you know for certain that Tiger's wife was 100 percent against him getting his rocks off with porn stars? No, you don't. I wouldn't be so quick to judge Tiger based on his sexual appetite. In a less bored, more satisfied person's mind this was a non-issue. Trust me, the majority of upper middle class men who play more than 30 rounds of golf per year don't think less of Tiger because he got it on with women that aren't his wife.You use the term, 'false idols' to describe people who aren't what their mass marked, muliti-trillion dollar advertising campaign image makers presented them as. I bet you would be shocked to find out President Obama doesn't write all those beautiful speeches he recites. Does it make him any less of a role model?You seem to be confusing 'image' with 'reality'.To make matters worse you cherry pick your targets while ignoring many positive, unquestionably ethical atheltes who've done it the right way, haven't cheated, haven't slept around, and have always had time to sign autographs for kids.You could have written this: "Some people aren't as they appear." That would have been suffiecent because your column didn't raise any new or interesting points. It repeated the same lame headlines that were used on CNN over the past months and years and tried to tie them together into some theme that 'athletes aren't good role models."Shits weak as they said in "Grandma's Boy." Shits real fuckin weak.Your example of an athlete doing things the right way is a freaking pro wresteler. I'm shaking my head on this one. Not in disbelief, but in solemn accpetance of the fact that so many people in our world actually believe everything they're told by the media and lack the critical thinking skills to see through the hype and the billion dollar ad campaigns and realize that those pro atheletes are everyday people who have extra ordinary physical gifts.The list of big name pro athletes who are great role models, not just for kids, but for adults, old folks, and even free newspaper columnists far exceeds the list of those who 'let us down.' What fault can you find with Kevin Durant, Mike Trout, Adrian Peterson, or any other number of true sports stars that kids in real life actually look up to? While hardly anyone wants to be a bike racer, millions want to play in the NFL or MLB or NBA. They look up to the guys I've listed and many others in awe of not just their physical and athletic gifts, but the countless hours of incredibly hard work it takes for them to maximize those gifts and reach the top of their profession, all while staying out of trouble and being good citizens who greatly help their communities.Your point about college athletes not focusing on academics is incredibly short sighted. The vast majority of college athletes use their athletic scholarships to advance their career aspirations and even those who don't graduate have still networked and gained valuable life experience related to hard work, dedication, and teamwork. While a very small percentage of college basketball players are 'one and done', those who are would be foolish to not to be. Why should a player like Derick Rose, Antony Davis, Carmello Anthony, Kyrie Irving, or Kevin Durant play four years of college ball for free when they could be making tens of millioins of dollars playing professionaly? Would you feel the same way about an author who was capable of writing multiple best selling novels at 20 years old? If that author didn't finish his undergraduate degree in English before he became the next multi millionaire author would he be a poor role model in your eyes? What makes college educations important to the masses is the doors that open to graduates which lead to higher salaries and better job prospects. I assume since you are writing for a free paper like YES WEEKLY you are persuing a career in journalism. If you were offered a job writing for a well respected, internationaly known paper like the Washington Post at 19 years old, would you turn it down and say: "get back to me in three years, I need to get my BA in Sociology with a minor in English from UNC-Pembroke before I take you up on your life changing offer"? No, you would jump at the chance.The main thing you are missing in this peice is the realization that what is right for some is not always right for all. Some people are ready to go pro at 19 years old. It hasn't hurt LeBron James that he didn't see the inside of a college classroom before he made 900 billion dollars.True parents should be role models to their kids, that goes without saying. I don't think it was necessary to write a column bashing a few over hyped athletes, espically those from the sports of golf, bike racing, and track to make that point.Using John Cena as an example of someone who does it the right way makes this article that much more hilarious. Yeah kids be a steroid abusing, pain killer addicted, cocaine addled pro wresteler! That surely has long term growth potential!What makes Tiger, Lance and John Cena worth looking up to is their dedication to their craft and the fact that they put in the hardwork to make it to the top. Belive it or not, you don't just shoot HGH into your pee hole and become the best bike rider on Earth. You still have to work at it every single day of your life.I know there are numerous spelling errors and proably some misused words, punctuation errors and the like in this way to long comment. I'm not going to re-read and edit for clairty even though it would probably be helpful to get my message across to the author of this terrible column.I'll leave it at this: you have a long way to go to make it as an author anyone would want to read. Your topic was lazy, your examples were poor, and your lack of critical thinking was alarming. I know YES isn't used for much more than to line gerbal cages, but for crying out loud I would think someone at this fish wrap would have vetoed this column before the first letter was typed into Word Perfect on your Windows 95 OS Acer desktop. Maybe my rant will get me hired as the guy who hates everything column writer. Oh wait, I have career ambitions that extend beyond selling gay sex chat line ads in the back of a intellectually braindead waste of newsprint. That stuff is pretty expensive right? You guys should switch to online only, but then you wouldn't have those damn out of date machines taking up space on every other street corner in the county. Is it free: limit one, of just free. If its just free I'll start taking all of them from the crates they come in straight to the recycle bin and maybe in their next life that poor poor roll of paper that got turned into YES WEEKLY (all caps of course) will be blessed enough to be printed with something worth reading. Of course you can always put more pictures of drunken, provocatively dressed young women on those pages. I guess thats the only redeeming quality and your editors know it since they devote more and more space to those poor dumb but easy girls every week.Please get a clue,Thanks guys

 

 
Close
Close
Close